Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/65[56]: don't unset SCRATCH_RTDEV here

On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:36:33PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 08:57:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Both of these tests claim that they have to unset SCRATCH_RTDEV to avoid
> > formatting failures due to the rt bitmap consuming all the space in the
> > "small" data device.  However, the format doesn't constrain the size of
> > the data device, so the justification doesn't apply.  Remove the whole
> > thing.
> 
> Looks good, but as-is clashes with my
> "formalize and fix disabling the RT subvolume" patch.  It might make
> sense to take these two patches first, and then modified version
> of
> 
> "formalize and fix disabling the RT subvolume"
> 
> and
> 
> "common: skip data write EIO survival tests on fatal configs"
> 
> on top of that.

Whatever order's most convenient for you is 100% ok with me.
That said, yes, let's remove the braindamage from xfs/65[56] first.

--D