Re: [PATCH v2] common/rc: support f2fs in _require_fanotify_ioerrors()
Chao Yu <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:09:12 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fstests,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/17/26 18:47, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:25:37AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 7/7/26 18:13, Anand Suveer Jain wrote: >>> On 6/7/26 14:43, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> f2fs has supported to report fserror, this patch adds support for f2fs >>>> in _require_fanotify_ioerrors(), so that we can run generic/791 on f2fs. >>>> >>>> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> common/rc | 3 +++ >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc >>>> index 494725547..f51ad59f3 100644 >>>> --- a/common/rc >>>> +++ b/common/rc >>>> @@ -6257,6 +6257,9 @@ _require_fanotify_ioerrors() >>>> x="$(_get_fs_sysfs_attr $TEST_DEV err_report_sec)" >>>> test -n "$x" && return 0 >>>> ;; >>> >>> >>>> + f2fs) >>>> + x="$(cat /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror)" >>>> + test -n "$x" && return 0 >>> >>> Don't we need to check if /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror >>> is present in the running kernel (there are helpers) >> >> Hi Anand, >> >> You mean _has_fs_sysfs_attr()? however, it forces to check first parameter $dev >> w/ block device type: >> >> if [ ! -b "$dev" -o -z "$attr" ];then >> _fail "Usage: _has_fs_sysfs_attr <mounted_device> <attr>" >> fi > > Hi Chao and Anand, > > The *_fs_sysfs related helpers were brought in by me in: > commit 2a7b77abcd1dde735186b363da24540706c43b73 > Author: Zorro Lang <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Jul 5 17:30:24 2016 +0800 > > xfs: configurable behavior on errors at unmount time > > At that time, I didn't think about the "features/" directory. > > Now, let me rethink this set of helpers. I feel that the *_fs_sysfs > family of functions shouldn't be restricted to the $dev directory, > we should remove this restriction. > > Following that, we bring in *_fs_sysfs_device (appending the _device suffix) > helpers which call *_fs_sysfs(). Also change the test cases who call these > functions. > > Finally, we can introduce the *_fs_sysfs_features functions (or simply use > *_fs_sysfs directly). > > Also, we have both *_fs_sysfs_attr and *_fs_sysfs, and the logic between > them is somewhat confusing and easy to mix up. Zorro, It makes sense, and good news to their user. Thanks for the proposal. > > I need to write a series of patches to clean up these logic. For this current > patch, we can start with a small-scale change first. What do you think? So I will use this first: f2fs) local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror" if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then return 0 fi ;; And then waiting for your cleanup? or if you want to clean up this, please do it directly while merging. Thanks, > > Thanks, > Zorro > >> >> >>> before reading it? >> >> How about this? >> >> f2fs) >> local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror" >> if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then >> return 0 >> fi >> ;; >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> esac >>>> >>>> _notrun "$FSTYP does not support fanotify ioerrors" >>> >>