Re: [PATCH v2] common/rc: support f2fs in _require_fanotify_ioerrors()
Zorro Lang <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:49:19 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fstests,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <amhKovVDjwawoWdQ@zlang-mailbox> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:24:10AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 7/28/26 01:57, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:09:12PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > > On 7/17/26 18:47, Zorro Lang wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:25:37AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > > > > On 7/7/26 18:13, Anand Suveer Jain wrote: > > > > > > On 6/7/26 14:43, Chao Yu wrote: > > > > > > > f2fs has supported to report fserror, this patch adds support for f2fs > > > > > > > in _require_fanotify_ioerrors(), so that we can run generic/791 on f2fs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > common/rc | 3 +++ > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc > > > > > > > index 494725547..f51ad59f3 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/common/rc > > > > > > > +++ b/common/rc > > > > > > > @@ -6257,6 +6257,9 @@ _require_fanotify_ioerrors() > > > > > > > x="$(_get_fs_sysfs_attr $TEST_DEV err_report_sec)" > > > > > > > test -n "$x" && return 0 > > > > > > > ;; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + f2fs) > > > > > > > + x="$(cat /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror)" > > > > > > > + test -n "$x" && return 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't we need to check if /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror > > > > > > is present in the running kernel (there are helpers) > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anand, > > > > > > > > > > You mean _has_fs_sysfs_attr()? however, it forces to check first parameter $dev > > > > > w/ block device type: > > > > > > > > > > if [ ! -b "$dev" -o -z "$attr" ];then > > > > > _fail "Usage: _has_fs_sysfs_attr <mounted_device> <attr>" > > > > > fi > > > > > > > > Hi Chao and Anand, > > > > > > > > The *_fs_sysfs related helpers were brought in by me in: > > > > commit 2a7b77abcd1dde735186b363da24540706c43b73 > > > > Author: Zorro Lang <[email protected]> > > > > Date: Tue Jul 5 17:30:24 2016 +0800 > > > > > > > > xfs: configurable behavior on errors at unmount time > > > > > > > > At that time, I didn't think about the "features/" directory. > > > > > > > > Now, let me rethink this set of helpers. I feel that the *_fs_sysfs > > > > family of functions shouldn't be restricted to the $dev directory, > > > > we should remove this restriction. > > > > > > > > Following that, we bring in *_fs_sysfs_device (appending the _device suffix) > > > > helpers which call *_fs_sysfs(). Also change the test cases who call these > > > > functions. > > > > > > > > Finally, we can introduce the *_fs_sysfs_features functions (or simply use > > > > *_fs_sysfs directly). > > > > > > > > Also, we have both *_fs_sysfs_attr and *_fs_sysfs, and the logic between > > > > them is somewhat confusing and easy to mix up. > > > > > > Zorro, > > > > > > It makes sense, and good news to their user. Thanks for the proposal. > > > > > > > > > > > I need to write a series of patches to clean up these logic. For this current > > > > patch, we can start with a small-scale change first. What do you think? > > > > > > So I will use this first: > > > > > > f2fs) > > > local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror" > > > if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then > > > return 0 > > > fi > > > ;; > > > > > > And then waiting for your cleanup? or if you want to clean up this, please do it > > > directly while merging. > > > > If f2fs wants to test this feature right away, I can merge your patch now and > > clean it up later. If it's not urgent, I'll take care of it all together. > > Zorro, > > Could you please help to merge it first? so that we can test 791 w/ last > upstream code, and also in case we missed to track its status to lose it. :P Sure, I'm good to have this first. Could you send a new patch version, if you'd like to change it? Thanks, Zorro > > Thanks, > > > > > Thanks, > > Zorro > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zorro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > before reading it? > > > > > > > > > > How about this? > > > > > > > > > > f2fs) > > > > > local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror" > > > > > if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then > > > > > return 0 > > > > > fi > > > > > ;; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esac > > > > > > > _notrun "$FSTYP does not support fanotify ioerrors" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >