Re: [PATCH] xfs/842: verify CoW after exchangerange with FILE1_WRITTEN on shared extents
"Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:59:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260728145946.GK2901224@frogsfrogsfrogs> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 03:16:20PM +0800, Lin Jiapeng wrote: > When a full-file exchangerange is requested with FILE1_WRITTEN for a > fully sparse donor file, every mapping pair is skipped, so no extents > actually move. However, the kernel decides to swap the reflink inode > flag based on the request geometry alone, so the target file used to > lose its reflink flag while still owning shared extents. A subsequent > write then took the non-reflink write path and modified the shared > physical blocks in place, silently corrupting the other file sharing > them: > > --- tests/xfs/842.out > +++ results/xfs/842.out.bad > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > QA output created by 842 > +orig changed: md5 e6065c4aa2ab1603008fc18410f579d4 -> 32c5189478e6bafa1cc76423f06c88f2 (write hit shared blocks in place) > Silence is golden > > This test clones a file so that both share extents, swaps the clone > against a sparse donor with FILE1_WRITTEN, writes to the clone, and > verifies after a mount cycle that the original file's data is intact, > i.e. the write was redirected through CoW. > > The kernel fix "xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue > with INO1_WRITTEN" refuses the reflink flag exchange whenever > FILE1_WRITTEN is requested, which makes this test pass. > > Reported-by: Lin Jiapeng(TencentOS Red Team) <[email protected]> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Lin Jiapeng <[email protected]> > --- > tests/xfs/842 | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/842.out | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/842 > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/842.out > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/842 b/tests/xfs/842 > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..6d5bcab > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/xfs/842 > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +# Copyright (c) 2026 Tencent. All Rights Reserved. > +# > +# FS QA Test No. 842 > +# > +# Make sure that a full-file exchangerange under FILE1_WRITTEN does not strip > +# the reflink flag from a file that still owns shared extents. When the > +# donor file is fully sparse, every mapping pair is skipped, so no extents > +# actually move; the target file must keep its reflink flag, and a later > +# write must go through CoW instead of modifying the shared blocks in place. > + > +. ./common/preamble > +_begin_fstest auto quick fiexchange > + > +# Import common functions. > +. ./common/filter > +. ./common/reflink > + > +_require_xfs_io_command exchangerange > +_require_scratch_reflink > +_require_scratch > + > +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full > +_scratch_mount > + > +# Create the original file with a known pattern and clone it, so that both > +# files share the same extents. > +_pwrite_byte 0x41 0 1m $SCRATCH_MNT/orig >> $seqres.full > +_reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/orig $SCRATCH_MNT/clone >> $seqres.full > + > +# Create a fully sparse donor file of the same size. > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'truncate 1m' $SCRATCH_MNT/donor Hehe, this is exactly the same sequence as the testcase I wrote yesterday afternoon, so the review is easy; Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]> (For extra clarity I also had done: # Check reflink flags _scratch_unmount _scratch_xfs_db -c "path /orig" -c 'print' -c "path /donor" -c 'print' | grep reflink _scratch_mount for direct confirmation of the incorrect inode flag state, but the md5sum failure suffices to prove the defect.) --D > + > +md5_before=$(md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/orig | awk '{print $1}') > + > +# Swap the clone against the sparse donor, claiming the donor is fully > +# written (-w). Every donor mapping is a hole, so all pairs are skipped > +# and the clone keeps its shared extents in place. > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "exchangerange -f -w $SCRATCH_MNT/donor" $SCRATCH_MNT/clone \ > + >> $seqres.full > + > +# Overwrite part of the clone. With the reflink flag correctly retained, > +# this must go through CoW and leave the shared blocks of orig untouched. > +_pwrite_byte 0x42 0 64k $SCRATCH_MNT/clone >> $seqres.full > +_scratch_cycle_mount > + > +md5_after=$(md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/orig | awk '{print $1}') > + > +test "$md5_before" != "$md5_after" && \ > + echo "orig changed: md5 $md5_before -> $md5_after (write hit shared blocks in place)" > + > +echo Silence is golden > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/xfs/842.out b/tests/xfs/842.out > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..643d052 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/xfs/842.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 842 > +Silence is golden > -- > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) > >