Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mv: check for missing destination directory before renaming

Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.git
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lucas Zamboni Orioli <[email protected]> writes:

>> lstat() can succeed and 'dir_st' may indicate something other than a
>> directory (for example, a symbolic link or a regular file).
>> Alternatively, it can fail with ENOTDIR when, for example, 'dst_dir'
>> is 'a/b/c' and 'a/b' is a file rather than a directory.
>>
>> Both cases will cause 'git mv' into a path assumed to be a directory
>> to fail.  Shouldn't we handle these conditions as well?
>
> Yes, agreed, both should be handled. For v3 I switched from lstat()
> to stat() so that the check follows symlinks the same way rename()
> does, and I handle the non-directory cases:

Generally, a symbolic link in a Git-managed working tree should not
be followed.  Following a symbolic link would mean that 'git mv x y'
could move 'x' outside the working tree if 'y' is a tracked symbolic
link pointing to a directory outside the working tree.  'git apply',
for example, avoids being fooled by a symbolic link for the same
reason.

I doubt that using stat() instead of lstat() is the right approach.
Doing so essentially amounts to ignoring the presence of symbolic
links.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.