Re: [PATCH 2/5] setup: detangle loading of loose object maps
Toon Claes <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:27:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.git |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Justin Tobler <[email protected]> writes: > On 26/07/24 05:48AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> When a repository is configured to use a compatibility hash function >> then we load the loose object map when we initialize the repository. >> This object map provides the mappings between the canonical object hash >> and the compatibility object hash. >> >> Loading the object map happens in `repo_set_compat_hash_algo()`, which >> calls `repo_read_loose_object_map()` in case the compatibility object >> hash is non-zero. This setup sequence has two major downsides: >> >> - We assume that the primary object database is the "files" object >> database so that we can extract its "loose" backend. This stops >> working with pluggable object databases. > > So IIUC, does this mean that `repo_set_compat_hash_algo()` is directly > reaching into the loose object source to load the compatibility object > map? I suppose it should be the responsibility of the respective ODB > backend to handle object compatibility. > >> - We require the object database to already have been initialized when >> configuring the object database. This means that we must intermix >> configuration of the repository and initialization of its >> sub-structures in a weird way. > > If there any reason we need to eagerly load compatibility object > mappings? > >> Refactor the logic so that we instead load the loose object map via the >> "loose" backend, which fixes both of the above issues. > > Sounds reasonable. > >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> >> --- >> loose.c | 11 +++++------ >> loose.h | 1 + >> odb/source-loose.c | 2 ++ >> repository.c | 2 -- >> setup.c | 5 +++-- >> 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/loose.c b/loose.c >> index 9dad75373b..a3b2dcedc2 100644 >> --- a/loose.c >> +++ b/loose.c >> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int insert_loose_map(struct odb_source_loose *loose, >> return inserted; >> } >> >> -static int load_one_loose_object_map(struct odb_source_loose *loose) >> +int loose_object_map_load(struct odb_source_loose *loose) >> { >> struct repository *repo = loose->base.odb->repo; >> struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; >> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ static int load_one_loose_object_map(struct odb_source_loose *loose) >> FILE *fp; >> int ret = -1; >> >> + if (!should_use_loose_object_map(repo)) >> + return 0; > > Previously the above condition has asserted in > `repo_read_loose_object_map()` which calls `loose_object_map_load()` for > each source. Do we expect each source to potentially answer differently > though? I've been wondering about this as well. The reason for this change is to also have this guard when odb_source_loose_new(), in source-loose.c (see further down in the patch), calls this function too. >> + >> if (!loose->map) >> loose_object_map_init(&loose->map); >> if (!loose->cache) { >> @@ -112,14 +115,10 @@ int repo_read_loose_object_map(struct repository *repo) >> { >> struct odb_source *source; >> >> - if (!should_use_loose_object_map(repo)) >> - return 0; >> - >> odb_prepare_alternates(repo->objects); >> - >> for (source = repo->objects->sources; source; source = source->next) { >> struct odb_source_files *files = odb_source_files_downcast(source); >> - if (load_one_loose_object_map(files->loose) < 0) >> + if (loose_object_map_load(files->loose) < 0) >> return -1; >> } >> >> diff --git a/loose.h b/loose.h >> index 6c9b3f4571..ed663ac550 100644 >> --- a/loose.h >> +++ b/loose.h >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct loose_object_map { >> >> void loose_object_map_init(struct loose_object_map **map); >> void loose_object_map_clear(struct loose_object_map **map); >> +int loose_object_map_load(struct odb_source_loose *loose); >> int repo_loose_object_map_oid(struct repository *repo, >> const struct object_id *src, >> const struct git_hash_algo *dest_algo, >> diff --git a/odb/source-loose.c b/odb/source-loose.c >> index 3f7d04a56e..812ca1c138 100644 >> --- a/odb/source-loose.c >> +++ b/odb/source-loose.c >> @@ -727,5 +727,7 @@ struct odb_source_loose *odb_source_loose_new(struct object_database *odb, >> if (!is_absolute_path(loose->base.path)) >> chdir_notify_register(NULL, odb_source_loose_reparent, loose); >> >> + loose_object_map_load(loose); > > Now we load the loose object map for the specific source when its > created. Here. -- Cheers, Toon