Re: [PATCH] completion: complete tracked paths for 'git diff'
Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:41:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.git |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
SZEDER Gábor <[email protected]> writes: > I think we should check whether the '--no-index' option is present on > the command line, and simply not call __git_complete_index_file() if > it is, to let Bash list all paths; i.e. each of those calls should be > protected by an additional 'if test -z "$(__git_find_on_cmdline > "--no-index")' condition, perhaps. Ah, I did not think of the "we made 'git diff' work without Git" mode at all. But I would avoid scanning the command line for '--no-index' for two reasons: (1) "git diff -S --no-index maint master" would not give you the '--no-index' mode. (2) When run outside the working tree of a repository, you do not have to say '--no-index'. These make detecting the "'git diff' but not Git" mode tedious and error-prone. I have not tried this, but if we arranged the code to fall back further to Bash-native "paths in $PWD" after the completion code in the posted patch found nothing, would it be sufficient? When trying to complete an untracked file in the working tree of a repository, if the file shares the same prefix with a tracked file, you cannot complete the untracked file without a prefix long enough to disambiguate it from the tracked one. Such a prefix may not even exist (e.g., 'foo' is tracked and 'foo~' is untracked; when you type "git diff --no-index foo<TAB>", you get 'foo' but not 'foo~', so you end up typing 'foo~' in full). In that sense, it is a regression, but supporting Git usage is the primary mission of 'git diff', so the trade-off may not be so bad. Thoughts?