Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: refs: put ref migration warning under the command

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 16:30, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
[snip]
> This is just an informational note and not an argument for using this
> particular construct.

Thanks for the explanation!

> By the way, I think I looked at the AsciiDoc admonition reference[1] and
> saw `CAUTION` and `WARNING`, but now I don’t recall why I chose Caution
> over Warning.
> 
> 🔗 1: https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/blocks/admonitions/

Hm, interesting. According to the docs, WARNING is to instruct the user
of any lingering danger, whereas CAUTION asks them to act carefully. And
while the first bullet point is merely a limitation (we cannot migrate
worktrees), the second bullet point is indeed a warning that concurrent
writers may cause harm. So going by that I think that a WARNING would
indeed be a better fit.

Patrick