Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] t6099, t6600: add side-exhaustion regression tests

Kristofer Karlsson <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 at 18:11, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The log message and diffstat contradict each other.  The addition to
>> 't6600' happens a bit later at step 6/10, which presumably introduces
>> this finite/infinite distinction, does it not?
>
> Oops, you're right, that was well spotted. I am not quite
> sure how I overlooked that. Will fix for v8,
>
> Looking back at the history, the commit message was correct
> at v4 but when the test commits were split/reorganized for v5 I
> failed to update the commit message to reflect that.

Heh, sorry for nitpicking.  Maybe others can give more serious
reviews on the topic.  This gives us an important optimization.

Thanks.