[Feature request] Separate explicit fetch mapping from default fetch selection

"Douglas Puchalski (dpuchals)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.git
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Git version: 2.55.0
Environment: macOS 26.6

I configure a remote to fetch only a small default set of branches:

    [remote "origin"]
        fetch = +refs/heads/main:refs/remotes/origin/main
        fetch = +refs/heads/team/*:refs/remotes/origin/team/*

This prevents `git fetch origin` from fetching and updating a very large
number of remote branches.

When I explicitly request another branch:

    git fetch origin topic/example

Git fetches the branch into FETCH_HEAD but does not create or update:

    refs/remotes/origin/topic/example

Consequently, the natural checkout command fails:

    git checkout -b topic/example origin/topic/example

The documented behavior couples two separate policies in
`remote.<name>.fetch`:

1. Which branches an ordinary `git fetch <remote>` selects automatically.
2. Where an explicitly requested branch is stored locally.

Please provide a configuration or default behavior under which an explicitly
named remote branch is stored as the corresponding remote-tracking ref, while
the remote's automatic fetch set remains restricted.

With that behavior, this sequence would work:

    git fetch origin topic/example
    git checkout -b topic/example origin/topic/example

It should not require fetching every remote branch, repeating the branch name
in a two-sided refspec, supplying `--refmap`, defining aliases, or handing the
result between commands through FETCH_HEAD. FETCH_HEAD is shared mutable state
and can be overwritten by another fetch between commands.

A backward-compatible opt-in configuration would address existing scripts
that rely on source-only fetches remaining temporary.

Relevant documentation:
https://git-scm <https://git-scm/>.com/docs/git-fetch
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.