Re: [PATCH v3] sequencer: honor --empty when a fixup!/squash! empties its target

On Thu Aug 6, 2026 at 1:32 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Farid Zakaria" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Let me know if you have any more comments. I suspect not much will
>> changes logic-wise once I rebase it onto 'next'.
>>
>> For clarity, is the f85a7e6620 commit the 'next' branch ? I would have
>> thought to just rebase ontop of 'next' and I'm a bit confused with this
>> commit hash.
>>
>> If there is anything else I should be aware of, I would appreciate a CC
>> if you can remember :)
>
> It has been quite a while since you received a reply from Phillip to
> the quoted message above.  Has there been any progress to share?
>
> Thanks.

Hi Junio,

Sorry I let this slip. I was waiting for the work to be accepted to
avoid rebasing on top of a moving target -- I am still a little new to
mailing list workflow & I have been using b4 (recommended from Linux).

I will pick this up again soon.