Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] completion: complete 'git history split' pathspecs
"D. Ben Knoble" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.git |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALnO6CBThicX2x_acKoSvWMOkr4pa5bVMH=RNMXO+BjEAxKSHg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 4:37 PM Vincent Mailhol <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arguments following the required revision of "git history split" are > pathspecs. Complete them from tracked paths, including after an explicit > "--". > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <[email protected]> > --- > Changes in v2: > > - New patch. > --- > contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 6 ++++++ > t/t9902-completion.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > index 6f1ba96763..d313780d8b 100644 > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > @@ -2197,6 +2197,12 @@ _git_history () > __git_complete_refs > return > fi > + > + case "$subcommand" in > + split) > + __git_complete_index_file "--cached" > + ;; > + esac In context, this seems late to me relative to other completion functions: - complete subcommands - special case a few options - handle revisions - split vs., say, _git_notes, _git_reflog, etc. where the pattern is case "$subcommand,$cur" in to dispatch on combinations. We could use "split,*)" to dispatch there. OTOH! The split completion wants to benefit from the other things done (like revision completion), and only then (before or after --) delegate to pathspecs. So, I dunno: I think this location achieves that goal, but it diverges somewhat from the way other completions are written. [snip] -- D. Ben Knoble