[PATCH v8 01/10] Documentation/technical: add paint-down-to-common doc

"Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.git
Message-ID <d74c9d578194f44cd662b69d05eadce42c474313.1786440533.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Kristofer Karlsson <[email protected]>

Add a technical document describing the paint_down_to_common()
algorithm used for merge-base computation, covering the paint
walk, generation number regions, and termination conditions.

Signed-off-by: Kristofer Karlsson <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/Makefile                        |   1 +
 Documentation/technical/meson.build           |   1 +
 .../technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc       | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
 commit-reach.c                                |   6 +-
 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc

diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile
index 2699f0b24a..f8dea4b395 100644
--- a/Documentation/Makefile
+++ b/Documentation/Makefile
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ TECH_DOCS += technical/long-running-process-protocol
 TECH_DOCS += technical/multi-pack-index
 TECH_DOCS += technical/packfile-uri
 TECH_DOCS += technical/pack-heuristics
+TECH_DOCS += technical/paint-down-to-common
 TECH_DOCS += technical/parallel-checkout
 TECH_DOCS += technical/partial-clone
 TECH_DOCS += technical/platform-support
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/meson.build b/Documentation/technical/meson.build
index ec07088c57..9ce11d5e48 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/meson.build
+++ b/Documentation/technical/meson.build
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ articles = [
   'multi-pack-index.adoc',
   'packfile-uri.adoc',
   'pack-heuristics.adoc',
+  'paint-down-to-common.adoc',
   'parallel-checkout.adoc',
   'partial-clone.adoc',
   'platform-support.adoc',
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc b/Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..4bd3c2adb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+Merge-Base Computation and paint_down_to_common()
+==================================================
+
+The function `paint_down_to_common()` in `commit-reach.c` computes merge
+bases by walking the commit graph backwards from two sets of tips and
+finding where their ancestry meets.
+
+Use cases
+---------
+
+Computing merge bases is used in two different ways:
+
+ 1. *Finding all merge bases* (`merge-base --all`, `merge-tree`,
+    `merge`, `rebase`). A merge base is a common ancestor that is
+    not itself an ancestor of another common ancestor.
+
+ 2. *Ancestry checks* (`in_merge_bases`, used by `merge-base
+    --is-ancestor`, `branch -d`, `fetch`). These ask: "is commit A
+    an ancestor of commit B?" If a common ancestor equals one of the
+    inputs, that input is necessarily the only merge base -- no other
+    common ancestor can be both as recent and not an ancestor of it.
+
+Both use cases share the same algorithm and implementation.
+
+Algorithm
+---------
+
+Given a commit `one` and a set of commits `twos[]`, the walk paints
+commits with two colors:
+
+  - PARENT1: reachable from `one`
+  - PARENT2: reachable from any commit in `twos[]`
+
+The walk uses a priority queue ordered by generation number
+(highest first), breaking ties by commit date. Each step dequeues
+the highest-priority commit and propagates its paint flags to its
+parents, enqueuing any parent that gained new flags. When a
+commit receives both PARENT1 and PARENT2, it is a merge-base
+candidate. A candidate gains the STALE flag so its ancestors
+propagate staleness -- any deeper common ancestor is necessarily
+redundant.
+
+[[generation-regions]]
+Topologically ordered and unordered generation regions
+------------------------------------------------------
+
+Commits fall into two regions based on whether their generation
+numbers provide a topological ordering guarantee:
+
+....
+    +------------------------------------------+
+    |          Unordered region                |
+    |  generation = INFINITY or V1_MAX         |
+    |  queue order: heuristic (commit date)    |
+    +------------------------------------------+
+                      |
+                      v
+    +------------------------------------------+
+    |          Ordered region                  |
+    |  generation = finite, unsaturated        |
+    |  queue order: topological                |
+    +------------------------------------------+
+....
+
+In the ordered region, a child's generation is strictly greater
+than its parent's. Same-generation commits are necessarily
+independent, so the queue always processes children before
+their parents.
+
+In the unordered region, parent-child pairs can share the same
+generation number, so topological order is not guaranteed. The
+queue uses commit-date as a heuristic, which typically produces
+a reasonable traversal order but may process a parent before
+its child.
+
+Commits not in the commit-graph have generation INFINITY; v1
+commit-graphs saturate at V1_MAX. Both place commits in the
+unordered region. Any optimization that depends on generation
+ordering must account for this saturation boundary.
+
+With generation ordering, values in the unordered region exceed
+those in the ordered region. The walk may therefore transition
+from the unordered region into the ordered region, but never in
+the reverse direction. Without a commit-graph, every commit has INFINITY
+and the walk operates entirely in the unordered region.
+
+In the ordered region, paint on a dequeued commit is final --
+no future step can add flags to it. In the unordered region,
+a dequeued commit may later gain additional paint. Paint flags
+are only added, never removed, bounding the number of
+re-enqueues per commit.
+
+Termination
+-----------
+
+The walk uses a `nonstale_queue` wrapper around `prio_queue` that
+tracks `max_nonstale`: the lowest-priority non-stale commit enqueued
+so far. Once that commit is dequeued, every remaining entry is known
+to be STALE and the loop terminates. Specifically, the main loop
+ends when one of the following conditions holds:
+
+  1. The queue is empty.
+  2. `max_nonstale` has been dequeued, meaning the queue only contains
+     STALE entries.
+  3. Generation cutoff: the dequeued commit's generation is below
+     a caller-supplied `min_generation` threshold.
+  4. Single result: the caller only needs one merge base, one has
+     been found, and the walk has entered the ordered region.
+
+Stale entry condition
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Once all queued entries are stale, no new merge-base candidates can
+be discovered -- that requires at least one non-stale commit from
+each side meeting. Continuing the walk could still invalidate
+existing candidates by proving one is an ancestor of another, but
+`remove_redundant()` handles that as a post-processing step, so it
+is safe to exit early.
+
+Generation cutoff
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Some callers (notably `remove_redundant()`) supply a `min_generation`
+threshold equal to the minimum generation of the input commits.
+These callers only need to determine reachability among the inputs,
+not find deep merge bases, so the walk can safely terminate when it
+dequeues a commit below this threshold.
+
+Single result
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+When only one merge base is needed and the walk is in the
+ordered region with generation ordering, the first candidate
+found is necessarily the highest-generation common ancestor.
+No remaining commit in the queue can be a descendant of this
+candidate (generation ordering guarantees children are visited
+first), so it cannot be redundant and the walk can stop
+immediately.
+
+This optimization is NOT safe when the date-ordering fallback is
+active, because commit-date order can visit a deeper ancestor
+before a shallower one -- see <<date-ordering-fallback>>.
+
+[[date-ordering-fallback]]
+Date-ordering fallback
+----------------------
+
+When the commit-graph has generation numbers v1 and no
+generation floor is specified, topological ordering
+(via generation numbers) is disabled. Topological levels are
+correct but unbalanced -- ordering by such generation numbers
+can sometimes cause the walk to detour too far before finding
+merge bases. Commit-date ordering typically reaches them in
+fewer steps -- see this change for more details:
+
+   091f4cf3 (commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed,
+   2018-08-30)
+
+With generation number v2 (corrected commit dates) we have the best
+of both worlds and do not need this fallback.
+
+For v1, `paint_down_to_common()` falls back to pure commit-date
+ordering via `compare_commits_by_commit_date`. Because commit
+dates are not monotonic (clock skew, rebases, etc.), the queue
+may visit commits out of topological order.
+
+This disables the optimization that depends on generation ordering:
+
+  - *Single result*: the first merge-base candidate found may not
+    be the shallowest, because a deeper ancestor with a higher
+    commit date can be dequeued first.
+
+Related documentation
+---------------------
+
+  - `Documentation/technical/commit-graph.adoc` -- generation numbers
+    and the reachability closure property.
diff --git a/commit-reach.c b/commit-reach.c
index b53c6b1cdf..8541264136 100644
--- a/commit-reach.c
+++ b/commit-reach.c
@@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ static struct commit *nonstale_queue_get_dedup(struct nonstale_queue *queue)
 	return commit;
 }
 
-/* all input commits in one and twos[] must have been parsed! */
+/*
+ * See Documentation/technical/paint-down-to-common.adoc
+ *
+ * All input commits in one and twos[] must have been parsed!
+ */
 static int paint_down_to_common(struct repository *r,
 				struct commit *one, int n,
 				struct commit **twos,
-- 
gitgitgadget
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.