[PATCH 2/2] packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack

"Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.git
Message-ID <5792c08f4ee0f9627ab1432d91299fe676e0a2f5.1787092446.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>

When a geometric repack runs concurrently with other git processes, it
can write a new pack and multi-pack-index and then delete older packs
that the new one subsumes.  One or more of those older packs may have
been indexed by the previous multi-pack-index.  A process that already
had the previous multi-pack-index open keeps using it, and that stale
index still records the removed pack(s) as owning some objects.

Because a multi-pack-index attributes each object to exactly one pack,
an object that exists in multiple covered packs is served only through
its recorded owner.  If that owner is the pack a concurrent repack just
removed, find_pack_entry() cannot serve the object: fill_midx_entry()
routes the lookup to the missing pack (prepare_midx_pack() fails), and
the regular pack fallback deliberately skips every multi-pack-index
covered pack.  The object is reported missing even though a perfectly
good copy survives in another covered pack -- for example a large "base"
pack that geometric repacking intentionally kept.

The false negative is not limited to one caller.  Any reader
(cat-file, rev-list, pack-objects, ...) can spuriously fail with
"unable to read object", and callers that only ask whether an object
exists get a wrong answer too, since the OBJECT_INFO_QUICK path never
retries.  Writers that merge in-core, such as "git replay", are hit
hardest: merge-ort treats the unreadable tree as a premature abort, sets
result.clean < 0, and returns without a result tree.

Teach find_pack_entry() to recover.  After the normal multi-pack-index
lookup and the regular pack fallback both miss, check whether the object
is nonetheless present in a covered multi-pack-index (bsearch_midx()).
If it is, its recorded owner must have become unavailable, so scan that
index's packs directly for a surviving copy.  The bsearch gate keeps
genuine misses (i.e. objects absent from the index) on the fast path, and
because the recovery lives in find_pack_entry() itself it also fixes the
OBJECT_INFO_QUICK callers that never reprepare.

This recovers the object without touching the multi-pack-index itself.
Reloading the stale index would be a more complete fix but would be much
more involved: other code (pack bitmaps, object name disambiguation)
borrows and caches the "struct multi_pack_index *" across object reads,
so freeing it underneath them would be a use-after-free.  Refreshing the
index with proper invalidation of those borrowers is left for future
work.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
---
 odb/source-packed.c         | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/odb/source-packed.c b/odb/source-packed.c
index 0890704e76..de96215069 100644
--- a/odb/source-packed.c
+++ b/odb/source-packed.c
@@ -31,6 +31,35 @@ static int find_pack_entry(struct odb_source_packed *store,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Recovery for a concurrent-repack race: a MIDX can name an owning
+	 * pack for an object that a simultaneous repack has since deleted,
+	 * even though the object still exists in another pack the same MIDX
+	 * covers (e.g. a kept base pack that geometric repack did not rewrite).
+	 * If the object is present in a MIDX yet none of the paths above could
+	 * serve it, its recorded owning pack has become unavailable.  The
+	 * regular fallback above deliberately skips MIDX-covered packs, so
+	 * scan this MIDX's packs directly to find the surviving copy.  The
+	 * bsearch gate keeps genuine misses (objects absent from the MIDX) on
+	 * the fast path.
+	 */
+	if (store->midx) {
+		struct multi_pack_index *m = store->midx;
+		uint32_t midx_pos, i;
+
+		if (bsearch_midx(oid, m, &midx_pos)) {
+			for (i = 0; i < m->num_packs + m->num_packs_in_base; i++) {
+				struct packed_git *p;
+
+				if (prepare_midx_pack(m, i))
+					continue;
+				p = nth_midxed_pack(m, i);
+				if (p && packfile_fill_entry(p, oid, e))
+					return 1;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
index 68143cb5b7..2b8ff6f3ed 100755
--- a/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
+++ b/t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh
@@ -1393,4 +1393,44 @@ test_expect_success 'pack.preferBitmapTips interprets patterns as hierarchy' '
 	)
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'lookup recovers object whose midx-owning pack was removed' '
+	test_when_finished "rm -fr repo" &&
+	git init repo &&
+	(
+		cd repo &&
+
+		# "keep" ends up only in the big pack; "dup" is deliberately
+		# placed in two packs so the midx has to choose an owner.
+		test_commit keep &&
+		echo duplicated-content >dup &&
+		git add dup &&
+		git commit -m dup &&
+		dup_oid=$(git rev-parse HEAD:dup) &&
+
+		# Roll every object, including dup, into a single big pack.
+		git repack -adq &&
+
+		# Build a second, "moderate" pack that also contains dup, so dup
+		# now lives in two packs that the midx will cover.
+		moderate=$(echo "$dup_oid" |
+			git pack-objects --quiet $objdir/pack/pack) &&
+
+		# Attribute dup to the moderate pack in the midx.
+		git multi-pack-index write \
+			--preferred-pack="pack-$moderate.idx" &&
+
+		# Simulate a concurrent "git repack" retiring the moderate pack:
+		# its files disappear, but the now-stale midx still names it as
+		# the owner of dup.  A valid copy of dup survives in the big pack.
+		rm -f $objdir/pack/pack-$moderate.* &&
+
+		# The midx routes the lookup to the deleted pack, and the regular
+		# pack fallback skips midx-covered packs, so without recovery dup
+		# would appear missing even though it is physically present.
+		echo blob >expect &&
+		git cat-file -t "$dup_oid" >actual &&
+		test_cmp expect actual
+	)
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
gitgitgadget
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.