Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] checkout: improve message for ambiguous remote branch name

"D. Ben Knoble" <[email protected]> writes:

>> +static void be_explicit(const char *branch,
>
> Be explicit about what? Reading below, a better name might be
> "advise_ambiguous_remote_branch_name" or something, idk.

It stands for "tell the user to be more explicit".  I agree with you
that the refactoring should be done as a separate step, on top of
which we should add the new feature, i.e., "give list of possible
candidates", as a separate step.