Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] checkout: improve message for ambiguous remote branch name

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 11:18 AM Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "D. Ben Knoble" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> +static void be_explicit(const char *branch,
> >
> > Be explicit about what? Reading below, a better name might be
> > "advise_ambiguous_remote_branch_name" or something, idk.
>
> It stands for "tell the user to be more explicit".  I agree with you
> that the refactoring should be done as a separate step, on top of
> which we should add the new feature, i.e., "give list of possible
> candidates", as a separate step.

I think it's a good idea to separate the steps, so I'll split the commits.
I am considering "advise_disambiguating_remotes" as a better function name.

Thanks,
-- 
Yoichi NAKAYAMA