Re: [PATCH 1/2] replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable
Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.git |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABPp-BGFpLi+FEoJOXvT=wBtexXiDmJ9vXQfc5JnBDrUk+zbDA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 11:09 AM Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes: > > > From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]> > > > > When objects involved in the merge cannot be read, the merge machinery > > will return early with result.clean = -1, and result.tree left as NULL. > > pick_regular_commit() tested only "if (!result->clean)", ignoring the > > case where "clean < 0". That causes the code to try to use > > result->tree, resulting in a SIGSEGV. > > > > Handle clean < 0 explicitly; the merge machinery will already have printed > > messages such as "Could not read <object>" and "collecting merge info > > failed for trees...", so we don't need to add much detail beyond the > > fact that the merge failed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]> > > --- > > replay.c | 7 +++++++ > > t/t3650-replay-basics.sh | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/replay.c b/replay.c > > index 463c900d6c..33e21b2032 100644 > > --- a/replay.c > > +++ b/replay.c > > @@ -327,6 +327,13 @@ static struct commit *pick_regular_commit(struct repository *repo, > > merge_opt->ancestor = NULL; > > merge_opt->branch2 = NULL; > > > > + if (result->clean < 0) { > > + error(_("merge of %s onto %s failed"), > > + oid_to_hex(&pickme->object.oid), > > + oid_to_hex(&replayed_base->object.oid)); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > if (!result->clean) > > return NULL; > > Hmph, so anything but "0 < result->clean" is a failure, but we by > mistake took any non-zero value as OK? That is an obvious mistake. > Well spotted and fixed. Thanks, but the bug was also caused by me -- e787e664da64 (replay: introduce pick_regular_commit(), 2023-11-24) -- so not sure I should get much credit for finding it three years later. > > + # Ensure replay gracefully handles the missing object > > + test_must_fail git replay --onto onto base..side 2>err && > > + test_grep ! "[Ss]egmentation" err && > > + test_grep "Could not read\|collecting merge info failed" err > > "test_must_fail" means "the tested command must fail voluntarily and > in a controlled way", so a segfaulting git-replay invocation would > not pass test_must_fail. Hence, there is no need to separately > test "test_grep ! '[sS]egmentation'". Oops, you're right. You said on 2/2 that I don't need to rebase because you're putting together an evil merge. Do you want me to resubmit with this line removed (without changing the series' base), or would you rather I avoid that to prevent merging work for you?