Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] bundle: get (mostly) rid of `the_repository`

Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.git
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:42:49PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 10:26 PM Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> > > > index b64716f252..a9330bf0d3 100644
> > > > --- a/bundle.c
> > > > +++ b/bundle.c
> > > > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> > > > -#define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> > > >  #define DISABLE_SIGN_COMPARE_WARNINGS
> > > >
> > > >  #include "git-compat-util.h"
> > > > @@ -21,6 +20,13 @@
> > > >  #include "connected.h"
> > > >  #include "write-or-die.h"
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * NEEDSWORK: this function implicitly depends on `the_repository` and is not
> > > > + * available because we dropped USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE. We can remove the
> > > > + * declaration once it's accessible via `repo_config_values`.
> > > > + */
> > > > +extern const char *get_log_output_encoding(void);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Doesn't this defeat the whole "drop #define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> > > as a mark that we are done with this file and no longer need to
> > > worry about it going forward because we won't be able to compile if
> > > somebody adds a new use?" premise?
> >
> > Yes and no. By removing the define early it allows us to not reintroduce
> > new references to `the_repository` by accident, but carve out a single
> > exception for one of the functions that still depends on it. The
> > alternative would be to not do that, and if so there is no guarantee
> > whatsoever that we won't introduce more references to `the_repository`
> > in this file.
> >
> > So I'm still leaning towards keeping this as-is, but I don't feel very
> > strongly about this. Let me know in case that argument doesn't sway you
> > and I'll adapt.
> 
> Would it make more sense to do this the way replay.c does:
> 
> #define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> <a bunch of includes>
> /*
>  * We technically need USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE for <X>, but
>  * do not want to use the_repository.
>  */
> #define the_repository DO_NOT_USE_THE_REPOSITORY
> 
> and remove the declaration of get_log_output_encoding() that you
> added?  Alternatively, should replay.c be adapted to the way you are
> doing it here?

The benefit of removing `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE` completely over
stubbing out `the_repository` is that it will also remove a couple of
function declarations that implicitly rely on `the_repository`, like for
example `get_log_output_encoding()`. So I think it's a slightly better
mechainsm over redefining `the_repository`.

Patrick
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.