Re: Post-XDR CLD cannot keep session up

On 02/07/2010 02:00 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, Jeff&  Colin:
>
> It looks like you broke something in CLD, not sure if server or client.
> There are two possibly related bugs. But first, here's the messages
> (The chunkd is run with -D). Note that I have 2 servers listed in DNS
> (both on port 4499), but only one is up.
>
> Feb  6 23:36:10 hitlain cld[1934]: databases up
> Feb  6 23:36:10 hitlain cld[1934]: Listening on :: port 4499
> Feb  6 23:36:10 hitlain cld[1934]: initialized: verbose 0
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1967]: Verbose debug output enabled
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_saveaddr: found CLD host hitlain.zaitcev.lan prio 10 weight 50
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_saveaddr: found CLD host elanor.zaitcev.lan prio 10 weight 50
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Selected CLD host hitlain.zaitcev.lan port 4499
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Listening on host :: port 8082
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: initialized
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: New CLD session created, sid 05B521BF4071EBA2
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: CLD file "/chunk-default/2" created
> Feb  6 23:37:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: CLD file "/chunk-default/2" written
> Feb  6 23:39:45 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Session failed, sid 05B521BF4071EBA2
> Feb  6 23:39:45 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Selected CLD host elanor.zaitcev.lan port 4499
> Feb  6 23:39:45 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:39:50 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:39:55 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:00 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:05 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:10 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:15 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:21 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:26 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:31 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:36 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:41 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:51 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:40:56 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:01 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:06 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:11 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:16 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:21 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:26 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:31 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:36 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:41 hitlain chunkd[1968]: cldc_udp_receive_pkt failed: -111
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: New CLD session creation failed: 17
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Session failed, sid 6C5A5E5D4D8F2270
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: Selected CLD host hitlain.zaitcev.lan port 4499
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: New CLD session created, sid 4E2A8ED73878F038
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: CLD file "/chunk-default/2" created
> Feb  6 23:41:46 hitlain chunkd[1968]: CLD lock(/chunk-default/2) failed: 11
>
> So, first regression: session ALWAYS fails, for no reason I can see.
> It takes 2 minutes 35 seconds, as you can observe from the "Session failed"
> message.
>
> Second regression: locks of failed session are not removed (this is
> what code 11 is). Once the original session fails, CLD client cannot
> re-acquire the lock, ever, until the daemon is restarted.

Thanks for the report.  That is definitely annoying...  I wonder if it 
is related to the ping_open bug I fixed...


> This definitely used work before the XDR, and it only takes 3 minutes
> to fail. Do you guys run and use chunkd or you just do "make check" and
> consider it done? I thought we talked about having virtually permanent
> cells and long-living CLD clients, because this sort of thing keeps
> cropping up.

My local one (shamefully not using SRV, like I should) is pretty 
outdated, back to the latest released tarballs, since I dislike having 
to lose data on upgrade ;-)

	Jeff