Re: [PATCH] don't expect inode name to be NUL-terminated (avoid read overrun)

On 09/10/2010 08:55 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> * server/msg.c (msg_get): Copy only name_len bytes, then NUL-terminate,
> rather than using snprintf to copy up to and including nonexistent NUL.
> ---
>
> valgrind exposed this.  The use of snprintf would have been
> correct if the inode name buffer (following the struct raw_inode)
> were NUL-terminated, but it is not.

applied -- good catch

out of curiosity, what is your patch base?

We combined cld and chunkd into a single 'hail' pkg, and from the 
pathname, your patch was generated from the older cld pkg.  We'd like to 
find the source and replace cld/chunkd with 'hail'.

F12?  F13?  rawhide?

Thanks,

	Jeff