Re: [tabled patch] abstract out TCP-write code
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:51:18 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.hail-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/22/2010 10:37 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:26:13 -0400 > Jeff Garzik<[email protected]> wrote: >> It is a common idiom even in GLib that callbacks receive two anonymous >> pointers; witness the data type GFunc's 'data' and 'user_data' >> arguments: >> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Doubly-Linked-Lists.html#GFunc > > There's a lot of retarged garbage in Glib, just look at their lists. > If someone smarter wrote Glib, we would not need struct list_head. I use both list types, because there's a use case for both. You don't always have the luxury of having a struct in which to embed data+next pointers. Allocated strings are an excellent example. GFunc has two parameters for a reason :) See for example http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Doubly-Linked-Lists.html#g-list-foreach It really is a common idiom, based on a common need, not just my style preference. :) Jeff