Re: [PATCH hail] const-correctness tweaks

On 10/22/2010 09:49 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 04:53 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> But even if curl were requiring some suboptimal signature,
>> it would be nice not to impose that on all projects that use hail.
>> Are there older curl headers that do require the const-free signature?
>> If there are and you want to support them, too, let me know -- maybe
>> I can cook up an autoconf test to make things work there, with minimal
>> impact.
>
> Nah, I wouldn't worry about the const signature, it's probably just out

er, s/const/const-free/


> of date documentation. If users appear running old OS's or OS versions,
> we can tackle autoconf'ing on a piecemeal basis as needs arise.