[patch tabled 2/8] Comment storage.c
Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:39:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.hail-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have a vague memory that "It should be ok to return" meant something related to the way our event dispatch worked, but I cannot recall any details. Ergo, useless comment. Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]> --- server/storage.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) commit 8c4bed7bd56a5bb2c3a654a494a6bb545f0d7db2 Author: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]> Date: Thu Nov 11 15:46:59 2010 -0700 Update comments. diff --git a/server/storage.c b/server/storage.c index c472961..5c6e3a7 100644 --- a/server/storage.c +++ b/server/storage.c @@ -161,9 +161,6 @@ int stor_put_start(struct open_chunk *cep, void (*cb)(struct open_chunk *), return 0; } -/* - * It should be ok to return - */ int stor_open_read(struct open_chunk *cep, void (*cb)(struct open_chunk *), uint64_t key, uint64_t *psize) { @@ -379,6 +376,9 @@ int stor_obj_del(struct storage_node *stn, uint64_t key) return rc; } +/* + * XXX WTF?! This accidentially tests a node instead of object! FIXME + */ bool stor_obj_test(struct open_chunk *cep, uint64_t key) { struct st_keylist *klist;