Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial ram disk

Arvind Sankar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.initramfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-api,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 05:05:48PM +0000, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 5/12/19 7:52 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 11:17 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >>> This proposal consists in marshaling pathnames and xattrs in a file called
> >>> .xattr-list. They are unmarshaled by the CPIO parser after all files have
> >>> been extracted.
> >>
> >> Couldn't this parsing of the .xattr-list file and the setting of the xattrs
> >> be done equivalently by the initramfs' /init? Why is kernel involvement
> >> actually required here?
> > 
> > It's too late.  The /init itself should be signed and verified.
> 
> If the initramfs cpio.gz image was signed and verified by the extractor, how is
> the init in it _not_ verified?
> 
> Ro

Wouldn't the below work even before enforcing signatures on external
initramfs:
1. Create an embedded initramfs with an /init that does the xattr
parsing/setting. This will be verified as part of the kernel image
signature, so no new code required.
2. Add a config option/boot parameter to panic the kernel if an external
initramfs attempts to overwrite anything in the embedded initramfs. This
prevents overwriting the embedded /init even if the external initramfs
is unverified.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.