Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: annotate remote tasks for kcoverage

Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.io-uring
Message-ID <CA+fCnZeE6-8NFXjguJJKc_=UuF-Puw8BdtiFcUhOd23y9pAKOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:44 PM Robert Femmer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Fuzzers use coverage information to guide generation of test cases
> towards new or interesting code paths. Syzkaller, specifically, makes
> use kcoverage (CONFIG_KCOV). Coverage information is not collected for
> kernel tasks unless annotated by kcov_remote_start and kcov_remote_stop.
> This patch annotates io-uring's work queue and sqpoll tasks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Femmer <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/io_uring_types.h |  4 ++++
>  io_uring/io-wq.c               |  4 ++++
>  io_uring/io_uring.c            |  3 +++
>  io_uring/io_uring.h            | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  io_uring/sqpoll.c              |  4 ++++
>  5 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> index 244392026c6d..b92b8e7169ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> @@ -504,6 +504,10 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
>         struct io_mapped_region         ring_region;
>         /* used for optimised request parameter and wait argument passing  */
>         struct io_mapped_region         param_region;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KCOV
> +       u64                             kcov_handle;
> +#endif

Jann recently sent a patch that added kcov_common_handle_id, I think
you can base your code on it and use that helper struct here.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260430-kcov-refactor-common-handle-v1-1-23a0c7a0ba38@google.com/

>  };
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
> index 8cc7b47d3089..16af75b1cfe0 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
> @@ -639,6 +639,7 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_wq_acct *acct,
>                 /* handle a whole dependent link */
>                 do {
>                         struct io_wq_work *next_hashed, *linked;
> +                       struct io_kiocb *req;
>                         unsigned int work_flags = atomic_read(&work->flags);
>                         unsigned int hash = __io_wq_is_hashed(work_flags)
>                                 ? __io_get_work_hash(work_flags)
> @@ -649,7 +650,10 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_wq_acct *acct,
>                         if (do_kill &&
>                             (work_flags & IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND))
>                                 atomic_or(IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL, &work->flags);
> +                       req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
> +                       io_kcov_remote_start(req->ctx);

And also use kcov_remote_start_common() here.

>                         io_wq_submit_work(work);
> +                       io_kcov_remote_stop(req->ctx);
>                         io_assign_current_work(worker, NULL);
>
>                         linked = io_wq_free_work(work);
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index 036145ee466c..f38b8eca6bbb 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
>         INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd);
>         io_napi_init(ctx);
>         mutex_init(&ctx->mmap_lock);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KCOV
> +       ctx->kcov_handle = current->kcov_handle;
> +#endif
>
>         return ctx;
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
> index e612a66ee80e..881d43bd529c 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
>  #include <linux/poll.h>
>  #include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
> +#include <linux/kcov.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/eventpoll.h>
>  #include "alloc_cache.h"
>  #include "io-wq.h"
> @@ -581,4 +582,27 @@ static inline bool io_has_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>         return test_bit(IO_CHECK_CQ_OVERFLOW_BIT, &ctx->check_cq) ||
>                io_local_work_pending(ctx);
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KCOV
> +static inline void io_kcov_remote_start(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +       if (ctx->kcov_handle)
> +               kcov_remote_start(ctx->kcov_handle);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void io_kcov_remote_stop(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +       if (ctx->kcov_handle)
> +               kcov_remote_stop();
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void io_kcov_remote_start(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void io_kcov_remote_stop(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> index 46c12afec73e..8d2876e31acb 100644
> --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> @@ -342,19 +342,23 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
>
>                 cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list);
>                 list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
> +                       io_kcov_remote_start(ctx);
>                         int ret = __io_sq_thread(ctx, sqd, cap_entries, &ist);
>
>                         if (!sqt_spin && (ret > 0 || !list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)))
>                                 sqt_spin = true;
> +                       io_kcov_remote_stop(ctx);
>                 }
>                 if (io_sq_tw(&retry_list, IORING_TW_CAP_ENTRIES_VALUE))
>                         sqt_spin = true;
>
>                 list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
> +                       io_kcov_remote_start(ctx);
>                         if (io_napi(ctx)) {
>                                 io_sq_start_worktime(&ist);
>                                 io_napi_sqpoll_busy_poll(ctx);
>                         }
> +                       io_kcov_remote_stop(ctx);
>                 }
>
>                 io_sq_update_worktime(sqd, &ist);
> --
> 2.54.0
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20260520204303.558392-2-robert%40fmmr.tech.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.