Re: [PATCH] io_uring/net: inherit IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE across bundle recv retries

Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.io-uring
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/4/26 10:07 AM, Cl?ment L?ger wrote:
> When a bundle recv retries inside io_recv_finish(), the merge logic
> OR the saved cflags from the previous iteration with the cflags
> returned by the new iteration:
>   cflags = req->cqe.flags | (cflags & CQE_F_MASK);
> 
> Bits listed in CQE_F_MASK are inherited from the new iteration, and
> all other bits (notably IORING_CQE_F_BUFFER and the buffer ID) come
> from the saved cflags. Before this change CQE_F_MASK covered only
> IORING_CQE_F_SOCK_NONEMPTY and IORING_CQE_F_MORE.
> 
> When using provided buffer rings (IOU_PBUF_RING_INC) with incremental
> mode, and bundle recv, io_kbuf_inc_commit() can leave the head ring
> entry partially consumed, __io_put_kbufs() then sets
> IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE on the returned cflags so userspace knows the
> buffer ID will be reused for subsequent completions.
> 
> Because IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE was not in CQE_F_MASK, the merge above
> silently dropped it whenever the final retry iteration partially consumed
> the buffer, and the subsequent req->cqe.flags = cflags & ~CQE_F_MASK
> save would have left a stale IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE in the carried-over
> cflags had one been present. Userspace would then wrongfully advance it
> ring head past an entry the kernel still uses.
> 
> Add IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE to CQE_F_MASK so it is both inherited from
> the new iteration into the user-visible CQE and stripped from the
> saved cflags between iterations.

Looks good!

> A test available in
> https://github.com/clementleger/liburing/tree/bug_f_buf_more allows to
> validate this fix.

Can you send in the test case separately for liburing?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Cl?ment L?ger <[email protected]>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6

I'll add a:

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: ae98dbf43d75 ("io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption")

-- 
Jens Axboe
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.