Re: [PATCH] block: split out a new blk_plug.h helper
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 08:38:12AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 7/6/26 6:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h >> index 9213a5716f95..20cb8ed7d987 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h >> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >> #include <linux/types.h> >> #include <linux/blk_types.h> >> +#include <linux/blk_plug.h> >> #include <linux/device.h> >> #include <linux/list.h> >> #include <linux/llist.h> >> > I know it's a lot of cross subsystem churn, but wouldn't it be cleaner to > not include blk_plug.h in blkdev.h, but patch the update the consumers? A > quick grep shows 68 files that would need updating and some you already > have updated. Right now blkdev.h needs the rq_list from it. So we'd need to move that to linux/types.h or something first, which feels a bit iffy. And no, including blk_types.h in blk_plug.h is not a solution, as that is still touched far too often.