[PATCH] fanotify: Fix spelling mistake "enforecement" -> "enforcement"

Ethan Carter Edwards <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There is a spelling mistake in a comment. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <[email protected]>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index bfe884d624e7..38290b9c07f7 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int fanotify_encode_fh(struct fanotify_fh *fh, struct inode *inode,
 	/*
 	 * Unlike file_handle, type and len of struct fanotify_fh are u8.
 	 * Traditionally, filesystem return handle_type < 0xff, but there
-	 * is no enforecement for that in vfs.
+	 * is no enforcement for that in vfs.
 	 */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_HANDLE_SZ > 0xff || FILEID_INVALID > 0xff);
 	if (type <= 0 || type >= FILEID_INVALID || fh_len != dwords << 2)

---
base-commit: c7275b05bc428c7373d97aa2da02d3a7fa6b9f66
change-id: 20260418-fanotify-typo-c4ec2ad325f0

Best regards,
-- 
Ethan Carter Edwards <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.