Re: [PATCH] iio: backend: fix uninitialized data in debugfs

Maxwell Doose <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAKqfh0FMsor4WnrdMcXrF4+G=m-Vu=nGq5ieDz8C=bUOvicT-g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:28 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 09:12:38AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 05:55:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 01:42:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 01:38:50PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > >    168          ret = sscanf(buf, "%i %i", &back->cached_reg_addr, &val);
> > > > >                              ^^^
> > > > > Uninitialized variable.
> > > >
> > > > s/variable/data/.
> > >
> > > With what I asked in the previous reply and what you explained there
> > > (thanks, btw!) I still think your patches are not fully correct. They
> > > will require to atomically write all or nothing. If we want support
> > > partial writes we need to go with that differently (reset ppos when
> > > we got enough or more than enough data).
> >
> > Requiring writes to syfs and debugfs be atomic is pretty normal and
> > works well in practice.  These are very small writes.
>
> Perhaps. In any case your patch will break existing partial writes, right?
> I'm still considering that resetting ppos is the right thing to do. Just
> need to find where the best place is to do that.
>

I'm certainly no expert on simple_write_to_buffer() but something in
me tells me that writing in the middle of a buffer is a code smell.
But you all seem much more informed in that regard so don't trust me
:)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.