Re: [PATCH] rnbd-clt: Use common error handling code in rnbd_get_iu()

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 9:03 PM Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:58:47 +0200
>
> Use an additional label so that a bit of exception handling can be better
> reused at the end of an if branch.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> index 4d6725a0035e..d8e3f145ee2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> @@ -329,10 +329,8 @@ static struct rnbd_iu *rnbd_get_iu(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess,
>                 return NULL;
>
>         permit = rnbd_get_permit(sess, con_type, wait);
> -       if (!permit) {
> -               kfree(iu);
> -               return NULL;
> -       }
> +       if (!permit)
> +               goto free_iu;
>
>         iu->permit = permit;
>         /*
> @@ -349,6 +347,7 @@ static struct rnbd_iu *rnbd_get_iu(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess,
>
>         if (sg_alloc_table(&iu->sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>                 rnbd_put_permit(sess, permit);
> +free_iu:

Thanks for the patch.
It does what it mentioned in the commit description, but maybe we do
not need to do this?

If there was a kfree before the last "return iu;", it would have made
more sense. But jumping to the middle of a conditional block to reuse
the free and return seems forced.

>                 kfree(iu);
>                 return NULL;
>         }
> --
> 2.54.0
>