Re: [cocci] [1/36] coccinelle: misc: add cond_return_no_effect.cocci
Markus Elfring <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:32:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> =E2=80=A6 >>> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/cond_return_no_effect.cocci =E2=80=A6 > Combining them with two separate metavariables would be okay, Thanks that you can think a bit more about such a design variant. > but I > don't see much benefit in that change. Further metavariables can eventually be shared for an SmPL rule. How do you think about to avoid repeated search efforts by separate SmPL r= ules (for the patch mode)? > So I'd prefer to stay existing > form. There are different SmPL coding style preferences involved. Regards, Markus