Re: [cocci] [1/36] coccinelle: misc: add cond_return_no_effect.cocci
Markus Elfring <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:50:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Further metavariables can eventually be shared for an SmPL rule. >> >> How do you think about to avoid repeated search efforts by separate SmP= L rules >> (for the patch mode)? >=20 > Are there impressive performance improvements from merging the rules? I got the impression that representative benchmarking systems are not avai= lable for detailed system tests of the Coccinelle software (including coccicheck= scripts) so far. > If so, could you share an example or numbers? The evaluation of some SmPL scripts gets occasionally measured. Regards, Markus