Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/[email protected]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:07:20 -0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kernel-testers,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+55aFxv7+Kf=sRj7RCSeY0dcVFMcUiXVKT=CY-2aFti5bO4yA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject : Simultaneous cat and external keyboard input causing kernel panic > Submitter : Timo Jyrinki <[email protected]> > Date : 2011-11-03 12:14 > Message-ID : CAJtFfxmovJHspHHKbvBVc4pw+u5mjGmUejCXEzdV+GqE=jVSOQ@mail.gmail.com > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132032253903074&w=2 So while funny, I doubt this is actually a bug. It's a feature, as pointed out by Clemens Ladisch in that thread. It's simply sysrq-c: "perform a system crash by a NULL pointer dereference". Now, I'm perfectly willing to consider that feature to be a mis-feature, and that this should be considered a bug to be fixed. But it is not a regression. Keeping it on the regression list just because it is amusing is understandable, though ;) Linus