Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:16:25 -0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kernel-testers,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALCETrXP63VYU6mvxuUJKq7uJ-a3LG6c4t6asQFGUsJnrP6_ow@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds > <torvalds-de/[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Subject : [3.1 REGRESSION] Commit 5cec93c216db77c45f7ce970d46283bcb1933884 breaks the Chromium seccomp sandbox >>> Submitter : Nix <[email protected]> >>> Date : 2011-11-14 0:40 >>> Message-ID : [email protected] >>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132123396226377&w=2 >> This is apparently fixed in seccompsandbox. See: https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/issues/detail?id=17 https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/source/detail?r=178 Unless someone objects, I'll consider this to not be a kernel regression worth fixing. --Andy