Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:35:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kernel-testers,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >From what I can see, you get the following callchain: > > start_kernel > |-> setup_arch > |-> x86_init.oem.arch_setup = xen_arch_setup > .... > |-> check_bugs > |-> identify_boot_cpu > |-> identify_cpu > |-> select_idle_routine > > > so xen_arch_setup will set pm_idle and select_idle_routine will honour > it. I'm being told this is run either in the dom0 or the paravirt guest > and if so, I don't see any issue with this for baremetal. So you can > have my ACK provided this is tested on baremetal too. Tested on baremetal and there were no abnormalities. Thanks!