Re: [GIT PULL] KEYS: keys-next-7.1-rc1

On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 02:52:06PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 at 14:38, Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I tested both PRs for the same baseline with two separate buildroot builds of
> 
> You threw away any and all testing that had been done by anybody else
> in linux-next.
> 
> And you rebased things on top of a random commit-of-the-day during the
> merge window, when things are possibly unstable due to all the *other*
> churn going on.
> 
> In other words, you did *EVERYTHING* that you shouldn't be doing, and
> that the documentation tells you not to do.
> 
> The WHOLE POINT of being in linux-next and being ready when the merge
> window opens is gone. All for apparently nothing.
> 
> Those stable cc tags do not add *any* value, since you could just have
> cc'd stable later instead.
> 
> I'm not pulling this. You need to stop doing this pointless churn, and
> read the docs on rebasing. See
> 
>    Documentation/maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst
> 
> about how you are *not* supposed to randomly just rebase, and
> _particularly_ not rebase on top of some random state during the merge
> window.

"A frequent cause of merge-window trouble is when Linus is presented with a
patch series that has clearly been reparented, often to a random commit,
shortly before the pull request was sent.  The chances of such a series
having been adequately tested are relatively low - as are the chances of
the pull request being acted upon."

OK, point digested.

I can update 'next' to contain only fixes from these PRs, and hold on up
til doing PR for -rc2 (as corrective step).

> 
>           Linus

BR, Jarkko