RE: FW: [Bug 117] New: [KVM-IPF] RTL8139 emulated network card can not work

"Zhang, Xiantao" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kvm-ia64
Message-ID <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC01AFAAB7@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Now I am seeing this in my syslog:
>> 
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 5 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 3 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 2 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 5 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 3 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 2 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 5 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 3 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 2 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 5 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 3 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 2 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 5 irq check
>> Oct 10 07:21:34 a4700rac kernel: vcpu 3 irq check
>> 
>> Note that I never seem to see irq checks for cpus 4, 6, 7 ..... maybe
>> syslog is chewing them up though, but it seems strange that they
>> never seem to appear.
> 
> Now, this is where it gets strange - I pulled out the above snapshot
> why the system was stuck in the boot process. However after a bit it
> came back and irqs showed up on cpu 4, 6, 7 as well..... adding the
> printk seems to have have an impact.... strange.
Hi, Jes
	Interesting finding!  Since this is a regression issue, maybe we
can use git-bisect to identify it.  Anyone wants to take it ? Thanks!
Thanks
Xiantao
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.