Re: [patch] remove vcpu_info array v5

Jes Sorensen wrote:
> If we have reasons where we actually rely on the cpu number, and thats
> not counting end-user pretty-number-print concerns, then I found that
> we practically never use the cpu number. If we really use it a lot, I
> agree we need a fast way, I just didn't hit it in my builds. What did I
> miss?
>

The code I mentioned only runs if the -no-kvm-irqchip option is passed.  
It's not the highest performing option...

So this isn't used a lot.  But cpus definitely use cpu numbers (as apic 
ids), so qemu needs to be prepared to handle this.  As to scalability, 
that takes will take a lot more work than removing/changing arbitrary 
limits.  Look at qemu_mutex and weep.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function