Re: [patch] remove vcpu_info array v5

Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>> What I meant was that I was able to compile the code, and there was 
>>> only
>>> one piece left that needed that function, which is why I moved it and
>>> made it static in the acpi code.
>>>
>>
>> That's because there is another static array in acpi.c...
>
> Which array are you talking about? ACPI has it's own limitations, like
> we need ACPI 3.0 to go beyond 256 processors :-(
>

Sorry.  apic.c:

   static APICState *local_apics[MAX_APICS + 1];

A lucky typo, though, since it brought the acpi issue into the discussion.

>>> Well we have to start somewhere. Just because there's limits in other
>>> areas too, doesn't mean we should discard valid improvements elsewhere.
>>> I'll get to some of that at some point, but there's soo many cards used
>>> to build this house....
>>
>> Your patch builds the 16383rd floor while ignoring the 15th.  Qemu 
>> scaling issues are much, much more painful than what you were 
>> addressing.
>
> Well I am not ignoring the 15th floor, I am just putting in expandable
> rails that can go all the way to the 16383rd. Next I'll get to look at
> putting in the button to make the elevator stop at the 15th+ floors :)

Well I want 16384 buttons in the elevator, not one button you need to 
press 16383 times to get to your floor :)

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function