Re: qemu-kvm.git now live

Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kvm-ia64,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>  
>>>>>> Where/how does the
>>>>>> migration code disable dirty logging?
>>>>>>                   
>>>>> Should be phase 3 of ram_save_live().
>>>>>             
>>>> But only in qemu-kvm. What is the plan about pushing it upstream? Then
>>>> we could discuss how to extend the exiting support best.
>>>>         
>>> Pushing things upstream is quite difficult because of the very different
>>> infrastructure.
>>>     
>>
>> Isn't the midterm goal to get rid of most of these differences (namely
>> libkvm)?
>>   
> 
> Yes, but not by removing existing functionality.

No one said this.

> 
>>  
>>> It's unfortunate that upstream rewrote everything
>>> instead of changing things incrementally.  Rewrites are almost always a
>>> mistake since they throw away accumulated knowledge.
>>>     
>>
>> I disagree, at least in this particular case. Upstream already diverged
>> from qemu-kvm, and the latter provided no comparable alternative for
>> slot management and dirty logging. And I still don't see that we lost
>> anything that could not easily be re-integrated into upstream (ie.
>> global dirty logging), finally leading to a cleaner and more complete
>> result.
>>   
> 
> It could have been done differently, by morphing the existing support
> into something mergable, and merging that.  In this way, we'd ensure no
> needed functionality is lost.

The existing support lacked features upstream already had and instead
required additional hacks to make qemu-kvm work.

> 
> As is, we're adding something simple, then discovering it's
> insufficient.  We're throwing away information, that's not a good way to
> make progress.

I doubt this applies here.

> 
>> So, what bits are missing to make KVM migration work in upstream?
>>   
> 
> I don't know of anything beyond dirty logging.
> 

OK, then I will pick this up and have a look at something comparable to
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_tracking() for upstream.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.