Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: rectify selection to ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc,org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> writes: > Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> writes: > >> Commit 66f24fa766e3 ("mm: drop redundant ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK") >> selects the non-existing config ARCH_ENABLE_PMD_SPLIT_PTLOCK in >> ./arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype, but clearly it intends to select >> ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK here (notice the word swapping!), as this >> commit does select that for all other architectures. >> >> Rectify selection to ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK instead. >> > > Yikes, yes, 66f24fa766e3 does seem to have got that wrong. It looks like > that went into 5.13. > > I think we want to specifically target this for stable so that we don't > lose the perfomance and scalability benefits of split pmd ptlocks: > > Cc: [email protected] # v5.13+ > > (I don't think you need to do another revision for this, I think mpe > could add it when merging.) Yeah. I rewrote the change log a bit to make it clear this is a bug fix, not a harmless cleanup. cheers powerpc: Re-enable ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK Commit 66f24fa766e3 ("mm: drop redundant ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK") broke PMD split page table lock for powerpc. It selects the non-existent config ARCH_ENABLE_PMD_SPLIT_PTLOCK in arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype, but clearly intended to select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK (notice the word swapping!), as that commit did for all other architectures. Fix it by selecting the correct symbol ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. Fixes: 66f24fa766e3 ("mm: drop redundant ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK") Cc: [email protected] # v5.13+ Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> [mpe: Reword change log to make it clear this is a bug fix] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]