Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: RISC-V: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS
Anup Patel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc,org.infradead.lists.kvm-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAhSdy3VTfXmt4ub9SWwFQWwcqCS07WkwXdh6ObOcoZSp5oY=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:05 PM Vitaly Kuznetsov <[email protected]> wrote: > > It doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number of > vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <[email protected]> Looks good to me. For KVM RISC-V: Acked-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]> Thanks, Anup > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c > index 26399df15b63..fb18af34a4b5 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) > r = 1; > break; > case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS: > - r = num_online_cpus(); > + r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS); > break; > case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: > r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS; > -- > 2.33.1 >