Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86: Drop arbitraty KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc,org.infradead.lists.kvm-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/16/21 17:34, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS is used to get the "recommended" maximum number of > VCPUs and arm64/mips/riscv report num_online_cpus(). Powerpc reports > either num_online_cpus() or num_present_cpus(), s390 has multiple > constants depending on hardware features. On x86, KVM reports an > arbitrary value of '710' which is supposed to be the maximum tested > value but it's possible to test all KVM_MAX_VCPUS even when there are > less physical CPUs available. > > Drop the arbitrary '710' value and return num_online_cpus() on x86 as > well. The recommendation will match other architectures and will mean > 'no CPU overcommit'. > > For reference, QEMU only queries KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS to print a warning > when the requested vCPU number exceeds it. The static limit of '710' > is quite weird as smaller systems with just a few physical CPUs should > certainly "recommend" less. > > Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost<[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov<[email protected]> Given that KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS has already been dropped in 5.16, I changed the commit message to KVM: x86: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS It doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number of vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs. Paolo