Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: Don't null dereference ops->destroy

Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kvm-ppc,org.kernel.vger.kvm
Message-ID <Yo05tuQZorCO/[email protected]>
On Tue, May 24, 2022, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> There are 2 places calling kvm_device_ops::destroy():
> 1) when creating a KVM device failed;
> 2) when a VM is destroyed: kvm_destroy_devices() destroys all devices
> from &kvm->devices.
> 
> All 3 Book3s's interrupt controller KVM devices (XICS, XIVE, XIVE-native)
> do not define kvm_device_ops::destroy() and only define release() which
> is normally fine as device fds are closed before KVM gets to 2) but
> by then the &kvm->devices list is empty.
> 
> However Syzkaller manages to trigger 1).
> 
> This adds checks in 1) and 2).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> I could define empty handlers for XICS/XIVE guys but
> kvm_ioctl_create_device() already checks for ops->init() so I guess
> kvm_device_ops are expected to not have certain handlers.

Oof.  IMO, ->destroy() should be mandatory in order to pair with ->create().
kvmppc_xive_create(), kvmppc_xics_create(), and kvmppc_core_destroy_vm() are doing
some truly funky stuff to avoid leaking the device that's allocate in ->create().
A nop/dummy ->destroy() would be a good place to further document those shenanigans.
There's a comment at the end of the ->release() hooks, but that's still not very
obvious.

The comment above kvmppc_xive_get_device() strongly suggests that keeping the
allocation is a hack to avoid having to audit all relevant code paths, i.e. isn't
done for performance reasons.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.