Re: [GIT PULL] KVM (mostly s390) fixes for Linux 7.2-rc7
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABgObfYqWf8WXNTZtz+W=CSK8yrGJhDruObp42LXkywhyK6=0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Il sab 8 ago 2026, 00:39 Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> ha scritto: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > I consider two weeks of wait, on a review that so far had been > > exclusively about taste, to *be* an honest attempt to gather the next > > round of feedback (which never came). > > Heh, and I was waiting for a response to Yosry's thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAO9r8zODKgCcjTBK=P6BuXBBZRoOAFMeRJU8BmkWL-BCX2LoBw@mail.gmail.com Heh^2, "Pick your poison, I guess" was not really inviting a response. Overall the sense of my reply to you (that is: there are two callers so let's not overthink wrappers) applied just as much to his message; and checking AMD vs. Intel in common code is a total no-no so I kept the reply in one place. > I also didn't prioritize responding (or even digging deeper) because I wasn't > expecting the patch to get fast-tracked to 7.2. It's not tagged for stable IIRC it doesn't apply anyway, but I am sure that the Debian/Proxmox folks appreciate having it in stable, so I was planning to do the backport by hand next week. I will wait of course now. > In other words, it's the lack of communication that's frustrating. Even a simple > > "Hey, I'm applying this unless someone screams" would have sufficed. Fair enough. > > If you had proposed the above small patch, for example, it would have > > been a completely different thing. > > Heh, if only past me had realized we could have done that. I guess the desire to > prove someone "wrong" on the internet is the mother of all invention? :-D Of course. :) Anyhow, I'll just post the revert+smaller patch in time for the merge window. Paolo