Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: ioapic: Update state only after successful delivery

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kvm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-08-10 at 14:17 +0800, Hao Zhang wrote:
> > From: Hao Zhang <[email protected]>
> > 
> > The I/O APIC tracks delivered interrupts in state that is later used to
> > decide whether an interrupt is still pending or blocked waiting for an
> > EOI.
> > 
> > For level-triggered interrupts, remote_irr means that a local APIC
> > accepted the interrupt and that the I/O APIC must wait for the
> > corresponding EOI before delivering the interrupt again.  For
> > edge-triggered interrupts, irr_delivered is used to hide delivered
> > interrupts from KVM_GET_IRQCHIP so that userspace does not reinject an
> > interrupt that has already left the I/O APIC.
> > 
> > But ioapic_service() currently updates that state before or without
> > checking that interrupt delivery actually succeeded.
> > kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() can return -1 when no destination is found.
> > Treating failed delivery as success can either leave a level-triggered
> > pin blocked forever waiting for an EOI that will never be generated, or
> > cause KVM_GET_IRQCHIP to drop an undelivered edge-triggered interrupt
> > from the saved IRR state.
> > 
> > Update I/O APIC delivery state only when the delivery result is positive,
> > i.e. when at least one local APIC accepted the interrupt.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4925663a079c ("KVM: Report IRQ injection status to userspace.")
> > Fixes: 5bda6eed2e36 ("KVM: ioapic: Record edge-triggered interrupts delivery status")
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Zhang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - Address Kai Huang's review by deferring both remote_irr and
> >    irr_delivered updates until interrupt delivery succeeds.
> >  - Extend the selftest to cover failed edge-triggered delivery and verify
> >    that the interrupt remains pending in IRR.
> > 
> > Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> >  arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> > index 757667fb2bfa..540e5665fbe4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> > @@ -474,9 +474,6 @@ static int ioapic_service(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq, bool line_status)
> >  	irqe.shorthand = APIC_DEST_NOSHORT;
> >  	irqe.msi_redir_hint = false;
> >  
> > -	if (irqe.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG)
> > -		ioapic->irr_delivered |= 1 << irq;
> > -
> >  	if (irq == RTC_GSI && line_status) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * pending_eoi cannot ever become negative (see
> > @@ -491,8 +488,12 @@ static int ioapic_service(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq, bool line_status)
> >  	} else
> >  		ret = kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(ioapic->kvm, NULL, &irqe);
> >  
> > -	if (ret && irqe.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
> > -		entry->fields.remote_irr = 1;
> > +	if (ret > 0) {
> > +		if (irqe.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG)
> > +			ioapic->irr_delivered |= 1 << irq;
> > +		else if (irqe.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
> > +			entry->fields.remote_irr = 1;
> > +	}
> > 
> 
> Ah looking at this I immediately realized I misread the code, that I thought the
> irr_delivered was for level triggered as well, but actually it is for edge
> triggered.  I guess we both got it wrong :-)
> 
> For edge triggered IRQ the existing code is correct I believe, since once the
> function is called the IRQ is considered delivered no matter whether it is
> actually accepted by LAPIC.  I think this exactly reflects the hardware
> behaviour.  (In fact, in ioapic_set_irq() you can see the IRQ is removed from
> irr_delivered for edge triggered right before ioapic_service() is called.)
> 
> For level triggered, I don't see ioapic->irr is cleared by KVM, but only cleared
> when ioapic_set_irq() is called with irq_level == 0.  I now (AFAICT) realize it
> is the right behaviour since it should be the driver which dessert the level to
> stop the level-triggered IRQ.
> 
> So in short, I think your v1 is correct, and sorry about my noise. :-(

Thanks Kai,

I checked the Intel I/O APIC redirection table documentation(https://edc.intel.com/content/www/it/it/design/products-and-solutions/processors-and-chipsets/comet-lake-u/intel-400-series-chipset-on-package-platform-controller-hub-register-database/1.2/redirection-table-entry-0-rte0-offset-10/).  
The Remote IRR bit is defined for level-triggered interrupts; for edge-triggered
interrupts its meaning is undefined. So yes, treating irr_delivered like
remote_irr was wrong.

For edge-triggered interrupts, once the I/O APIC starts delivering the
interrupt, the interrupt should no longer be considered pending in the I/O
APIC state that is saved through KVM_GET_IRQCHIP, regardless of whether a
local APIC eventually accepts it.

So I agree that v2 went too far by moving the irr_delivered update behind
the delivery result check.  I will drop that part and restore the patch to
only fix the level-triggered remote_irr case.

Thanks,
Hao
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.