[PATCH v9 21/21] KVM: x86: Use kernel timekeeping snapshot to get walltime+TSC

Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Replace the KVM-private vgettsc()+/do_do_realtime() timekeeping
reimplementation with calls to the recently crafted, generic
ktime_get_snapshot_id() interface.  As noted previously, the snapshot
provides both the system time and the raw_cycles (TSC), atomically paired
using a sequence counter.

With great pleasure, delete the now unused read_tsc() and vgettsc()

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
[sean: separate from other conversions, express joy at vgettsc()'s demise]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 85 ++++------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1513e4ae2353..a638898e528f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1381,82 +1381,6 @@ void kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *user_value)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 
-static u64 read_tsc(void)
-{
-	u64 ret = (u64)rdtsc_ordered();
-	u64 last = pvclock_gtod_data.clock.cycle_last;
-
-	if (likely(ret >= last))
-		return ret;
-
-	/*
-	 * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely
-	 * predictable (it's just a function of time and the likely is
-	 * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC
-	 * to generate a branch instead.  I don't barrier() because
-	 * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function
-	 * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code.
-	 */
-	asm volatile ("");
-	return last;
-}
-
-static inline u64 vgettsc(struct pvclock_clock *clock, u64 *tsc_timestamp,
-			  int *mode)
-{
-	u64 tsc_pg_val;
-	long v;
-
-	switch (clock->vclock_mode) {
-	case VDSO_CLOCKMODE_HVCLOCK:
-		if (hv_read_tsc_page_tsc(hv_get_tsc_page(),
-					 tsc_timestamp, &tsc_pg_val)) {
-			/* TSC page valid */
-			*mode = VDSO_CLOCKMODE_HVCLOCK;
-			v = (tsc_pg_val - clock->cycle_last) &
-				clock->mask;
-		} else {
-			/* TSC page invalid */
-			*mode = VDSO_CLOCKMODE_NONE;
-		}
-		break;
-	case VDSO_CLOCKMODE_TSC:
-		*mode = VDSO_CLOCKMODE_TSC;
-		*tsc_timestamp = read_tsc();
-		v = (*tsc_timestamp - clock->cycle_last) &
-			clock->mask;
-		break;
-	default:
-		*mode = VDSO_CLOCKMODE_NONE;
-	}
-
-	if (*mode == VDSO_CLOCKMODE_NONE)
-		*tsc_timestamp = v = 0;
-
-	return v * clock->mult;
-}
-
-static int do_realtime(struct timespec64 *ts, u64 *tsc_timestamp)
-{
-	struct pvclock_gtod_data *gtod = &pvclock_gtod_data;
-	unsigned long seq;
-	int mode;
-	u64 ns;
-
-	do {
-		seq = read_seqcount_begin(&gtod->seq);
-		ts->tv_sec = gtod->wall_time_sec;
-		ns = gtod->clock.base_cycles;
-		ns += vgettsc(&gtod->clock, tsc_timestamp, &mode);
-		ns >>= gtod->clock.shift;
-	} while (unlikely(read_seqcount_retry(&gtod->seq, seq)));
-
-	ts->tv_sec += __iter_div_u64_rem(ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &ns);
-	ts->tv_nsec = ns;
-
-	return mode;
-}
-
 static bool kvm_snapshot_has_tsc(struct system_time_snapshot *snap,
 				 u64 *tsc_timestamp)
 {
@@ -1523,11 +1447,14 @@ bool kvm_get_monotonic_and_clockread(s64 *kernel_ns, u64 *tsc_timestamp)
 static bool kvm_get_walltime_and_clockread(struct timespec64 *ts,
 					   u64 *tsc_timestamp)
 {
-	/* checked again under seqlock below */
-	if (!gtod_is_based_on_tsc(pvclock_gtod_data.clock.vclock_mode))
+	struct system_time_snapshot snap = {};
+
+	ktime_get_snapshot_id(CLOCK_REALTIME, &snap);
+	if (!kvm_snapshot_has_tsc(&snap, tsc_timestamp))
 		return false;
 
-	return gtod_is_based_on_tsc(do_realtime(ts, tsc_timestamp));
+	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(snap.systime);
+	return true;
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.55.0.679.g6767b8d81c-goog
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.