Re: tc question about ingress bandwidth splitting

Mandi! Grant Taylor
  In chel di` si favelave...

> > Interesting... i've found:
> > https://blog.scottlowe.org/2013/09/04/introducing-linux-network-namespaces/
> > and i've not understood how can i 'link' phisical interfaces with vethX.
> It depends what you mean by "link".

Beh, something similar to what i do now for IFB:

 tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 \
        u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 \
        flowid :1 \
        action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0



> > But after that, i need to use ebtales?
> Did you mean "bridge"?

AH! Sure, i meant 'bridge', not bond, sorry...


> You can also use traditional routing between the physical and the vEth NICs.
> You can even move the physical NIC into a Network Namespace.
> It *REALLY* depends on what you want to do.

I suppose, throw away 'ifb' and use veth in place. ;-)


With 'tc' command above, i 'pipe' ingress to ifb; surely i can create a
'route' between phisical and veth interfaces, but clearly i have to
manage a bit of routing and so on...


Can you provide me some examples? Thanks.

-- 
dott. Marco Gaiarin				        GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
  Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia''          http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
  Polo FVG   -   Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078   -   San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
  marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it   t +39-0434-842711   f +39-0434-842797

		Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
      http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
	(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)