Re: tc question about ingress bandwidth splitting
Marco Gaiarin <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:58:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.lartc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mandi! Grant Taylor
In chel di` si favelave...
> Say that there are two physical hosts on the network; A and B.
I think i'm missing most of the background here; there's some
doc/paper/wiki/... about NS/VETH i can read about?
Still i miss how can i 'link' various interfaces... for example:
> |
> +--+--+
> | WAN | DHCP
> | | New network namespace.
> | vE0 | Static
> +--+--+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> | vE1 | Static
> | | Original (main / default / unnamed) network namespace.
> | LAN | Static
> +--+--+
> |
>
> Apply tc rules to vE0 for traffic going down. Apply tc rules to vE1 for
> traffic going up.
This is exactly what i think to do. But... how 'routing' (in
loose/sparse sense, not literally) works on namespaces?
EG, normally i have public IP address assigned to WAN interface, and
private one assigned to LAN; LAN and WAN are not 'linked' between them,
apart routing and firewall rules.
I don't understand how NS/VETH came into this play... and is surely my
fault!
In my head i suppose that WAN is 'linked' (again, in loose/sparse
sense) to a couple of VETH interfaces as above, and i use vE1 to shape
egress traffic and vE0 to shape egress traffic (that is, ingress for
vE1).
Thanks!
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
Polo FVG - Via della Bontà , 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797
Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)