Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi()
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0jhDV+zYLZz=3CXg6_GFUuhq_3rQ_zU-K1hXTRBfpL+HQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 1:52 PM lihuisong (C) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 7/9/2026 8:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> > > > > Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() to make it somewhat easier to > > follow and diagnose (if need be). In particular: > > > > * Rename some local variables and reorder their definitions. > > > > * Change the type of local variables used for storing firmware-provided > > values to unsigned int (they cannot be negative). > > > > * Eliminate local variable "loop" that is redundant. > > > > * Avoid explicit pointer arithmetic. > > > > * Print the correct number of _LPI state packages in the final debug > > message. > > > > No intentional functional impact beyond debug output. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > index e8682f779249..cd506e9e5a84 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > @@ -872,12 +872,12 @@ static int obj_get_integer(union acpi_object *obj, u32 *value) > > static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle, > > struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info) > > { > > - acpi_status status; > > - int ret = 0; > > - int pkg_count, state_idx = 1, loop; > > struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; > > - union acpi_object *lpi_data; > > + union acpi_object *lpi_data, *lpi_pkg; > > + unsigned int lpi_pkg_count, state_idx; > > struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi_state; > > + acpi_status status; > > + int ret = 0; > > > > status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_LPI", NULL, &buffer); > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > > @@ -895,41 +895,46 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle, > > goto end; > > } > > > > - pkg_count = lpi_data->package.elements[2].integer.value; > > + lpi_pkg_count = lpi_data->package.elements[2].integer.value; > > > > /* Validate number of power states. */ > > - if (pkg_count < 1 || pkg_count != lpi_data->package.count - 3) { > > + if (!lpi_pkg_count || lpi_pkg_count != lpi_data->package.count - 3) { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Invalid _LPI state count\n"); > > ret = -ENODATA; > > goto end; > > } > > > > - lpi_state = kzalloc_objs(*lpi_state, pkg_count); > > + lpi_state = kzalloc_objs(*lpi_state, lpi_pkg_count); > > if (!lpi_state) { > > ret = -ENOMEM; > > goto end; > > } > > > > - info->size = pkg_count; > > + info->size = lpi_pkg_count; > > info->entries = lpi_state; > > > > - /* LPI States start at index 3 */ > > - for (loop = 3; state_idx <= pkg_count; loop++, state_idx++, lpi_state++) { > > - union acpi_object *element, *pkg_elem, *obj; > > + /* _LPI State packages start at index 3. */ > > + lpi_pkg = &lpi_data->package.elements[3]; > > > > - element = &lpi_data->package.elements[loop]; > > - if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || element->package.count < 7) > > + for (state_idx = 1; state_idx <= lpi_pkg_count; > > + state_idx++, lpi_state++, lpi_pkg++) { > > + union acpi_object *lpi_pkg_elem, *obj; > > + > > + lpi_state->index = state_idx; > > + > > + if (lpi_pkg->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || lpi_pkg->package.count < 7) > > continue; > > > > - pkg_elem = element->package.elements; > > + lpi_pkg_elem = lpi_pkg->package.elements; > > > > - obj = pkg_elem + 6; > > + /* Get the entry method first and skip the state if that fails. */ > > + obj = &lpi_pkg_elem[6]; > > if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) { > > struct acpi_power_register *reg; > > > > if (obj->buffer.length < sizeof(*reg)) { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, > > - "Invalid register data for _LPI state %d\n", > > + "Invalid register data for _LPI state %u\n", > > state_idx); > > continue; > > } > > @@ -937,7 +942,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle, > > reg = (struct acpi_power_register *)obj->buffer.pointer; > > if (reg->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE) { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, > > - "Unsupported entry method for _LPI state %d\n", > > + "Unsupported entry method for _LPI state %u\n", > > state_idx); > > continue; > > } > > @@ -949,36 +954,35 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle, > > lpi_state->address = obj->integer.value; > > } else { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, > > - "Invalid entry method for _LPI state %d\n", > > + "Invalid entry method for _LPI state %u\n", > > state_idx); > > continue; > > } > > > > - lpi_state->index = state_idx; > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 0, &lpi_state->min_residency)) { > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[0], &lpi_state->min_residency)) { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, > > - "Assuming 10 us min. residency for _LPI state %d\n", > > + "Assuming 10 us min. residency for _LPI state %u\n", > > state_idx); > > lpi_state->min_residency = 10; > > } > > > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 1, &lpi_state->wake_latency)) { > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[1], &lpi_state->wake_latency)) { > > acpi_handle_debug(handle, > > - "Assuming 10 us wake latency for _LPI state %d\n", > > + "Assuming 10 us wake latency for _LPI state %u\n", > > state_idx); > > lpi_state->wake_latency = 10; > > } > > > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 2, &lpi_state->flags)) > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[2], &lpi_state->flags)) > > lpi_state->flags = 0; > > > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags)) > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[3], &lpi_state->arch_flags)) > > lpi_state->arch_flags = 0; > > > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 4, &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq)) > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[4], &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq)) > > lpi_state->res_cnt_freq = 1; > > > > - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 5, &lpi_state->enable_parent_state)) > > + if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[5], &lpi_state->enable_parent_state)) > > lpi_state->enable_parent_state = 0; > How about move parsing lpi_pkg_elem[6] code to here? If it fails, the other things don't need to be done at all, so it's better to do it upfront IMV.